Skip to main content

WILL KAMALA'S GENDER BE THE REASON SHE WILL LOSE AMERICANS VOTE?

I speak directly to Americans of African descent who are considering voting for a candidate who thinks the only job they deserve is janitorial and low-paying jobs. Think again.

The concern many of these people have is "Can a woman run America?" If many of you reflect on who raised you, perhaps you have already answered your question. If you were raised by your grandma who instilled the fear of God in you, or your single mom who worked three jobs to put food on the table, then you know a woman can definitely run any organization.

The US is one of the Western countries that has not had a woman leader since its founding - the UK, Germany, Canada, and France have all had a form of female leader at some point in their history. The gender question was one of the reasons why Hilary Clinton lost the 2016 election. Some Americans just could not see a woman leading. You see the element of religion in this also - The Southern Baptist Convention does not appoint a female priest, and the Catholics do not as well. However, within the protestant movement, we have seen formidable women who have led flourishing congregations for decades. God appointed women as a prophet, poets, and judges (Deborah) in the Old Testament - before heaven, there is no gender.

What is at stake should inform the decision of who to vote for during this crucial election. There is so much at stake that could change the world order forever. The fate of our world is in the hands of a few - I hope my brothers will choose wisely, and remember their grandma and mothers who kept the home fronts and led them on the straight and narrow...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

DARWANIAN Theory - The Driving Force Behind American Capitalism Philosophy

Communism died, and capitalism survived. Capitalism is a supposed system that allows freeness in an economy - market forces in the hands of private owners control what happens to the economy with minimal influence by the state. Capitalism has produced enormous wealth in the West. There are so many millionaires and billionaires. The question is, what is the ratio of the stupendously rich and those who are just scraping by - living from pay check-to-pay check? The gap is huge between the rich and the poor in most capitalist states. When President Trump was going to deliver his tax reform, it favored the rich with about 80% of the tax benefits going to the top 1% richest people in America. The argument was that they create jobs, they should benefit more - money is being given to those who really do not need the extra cash but those who need it the most, aids is been taken away from people who are at the bottom of the ladder because of a few who lie on their social welfare claims. I h

STATE of THE NATION (NIGERIA) - February 2020

For 16 years, Nigerians believed that their problem was a political party called PDP. The other side agitated for those 16 years to wrestle power from PDP and many of us supported them. That other side has been in power for almost 5 years now, and things have gone from bad to worse compared to the PDP years. The money APC government has borrowed in 5 years is multiple of what PDP borrowed in 16 years, and the economy has gone down the drain. Nigeria has become the poverty capital of the world, and millions of children are out of school, there are no hospitals, unemployment is double digits and it has remained so for the better part of Buhari's time in office. The security situation has gone worse because the president is complicit due to the involvement of his kinsmen - he has shown zero will to tackle the problem decisively. The consequences of this is crack in the wall of the entity called Nigeria - with Amotekun launch in the South West and the US ban of Nigerians from ce

NO COLLUSION, Really!

Here is the deal: 1."NO COLLUSION" BUT: Son-in-law was allegedly exploring back door communication channel with the Russian government during the election. 2. "NO COLLUSION" BUT: Son had a meeting with a Russian operative during the election in a building that belongs to his father and lied about it multiple times. 3. "NO COLLUSION" BUT: Campaign manager at some point shared demographic data with a known person with ties to the Russian government. The same person is going to jail for lying about this, and he is known to be a friend of Russian Oligarch. 4. "NO COLLUSION" BUT: Three people in the campaign were convicted of lying to the FBI about their contact with the Russians during the election. 5. "NO COLLUSION" BUT: Personal attorney is going to jail for lying about a Russian deal that continued till the month of the election. 6. "NO COLLUSION" BUT: The first senator that endorsed him and later became his first Att