Skip to main content

Are we safer before or after Solemani - opinion is mixed.

The reaction you will hear when you talk to Americans and Iranians about the killing of Quassem Solemani is mixed, and I reason with both sides even though I tend toward one side than the other.

There are those who accept that the man was evil and had killed both his own people and other citizens, but questioned why Trump took out the man now. They alleged that he did it for political reasons. Unfortunately, he received widespread criticism for it except in his base - 55% of Americans disapproved and only 43% approved the killing. We were all saved from World War III if not that the Iranians exercised caution, they posited.

Some argued that this has changed the rule of engagement for wars where the US has been an advocate of civility since WW II. That the killing of the second most powerful person in a country like Iran has created a bad precedent for rogues leaders like Putin who could, for example, take out the president of Ukraine in the name of him being a terrorist who killed Russians and the US will not be able to do anything about it because of the Solemani ouster from existence. Leaders like Erdogan of Tukey, Duterte of Philipines, Military leaders in Myanmar, MBS of Saudi, etc have now been handed liberty to kill anyone in the name of terrorism and the US will be handicapped in questioning them.

Some said, oh, Solemani killed thousands since the Iranian revolution in 1979 and he deserved what he got. That he has master-minded the torture and the killing of his own people, and hundreds of Americans through proxies all over the middle-east. Yes, but what will be the consequences of such killing. There are so many bad leaders around the world who have killed many people - should they all be droned? Will it kill the ideology they live by, probably not.

One thing is clear, terrorism cannot be bombed out of existence. It is an ideology that has to be defeated through superior idea - ask Obama who killed more terrorists with drones in the middle-east than any American president before or after him. With all the killings of these bad elements, more and crazier extremist leaders developed. ISIS rose to prominence under Obama in spite of him droning as many of them as he could, including Osama and Al Awlaki - an American Islamic cleric who instigated many terror attacks against his fellow citizens. Darkness can only be defeated with light, hate with love, crazy ideology with a sane one. Only time will tell what this bad precedent, because of a cheap political score, will cause. Bad people need to go, but we need to wise in the battles we fight. Iraq and Afghanistan, 19 years after has not destroyed terrorism, it has caused it to spread.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

STATE OF THE NATION - Nigeria takes one step forward, and ten steps backward...

I just came back from Nigeria . I traversed the length and breadth of the nation a bit in my three-week stay. Something is different about the country compared to when I visited last year.... The people are more desperate... Hunger has increased astronomically.... The gap between the haves and have-nots has further widened... You feel impunity in the air... You see police collecting bribes openly like we have not seen since the Shagari era in 1983... There are more law enforcement agents on the roads now, yet the crime rate has not abated... You see VIO , Road Safety, State Law enforcers, the Police, everywhere mounting illegal roadblocks... I heard things from those close to the seat of power about those who hold the reins of power, and I weep for Nigeria - it is beyond disheartening... Projects are being abandoned because a significant portion has been given as bribes to government officials like governors and ministers, including major monarchs - they all collect money for projects...
Post a Comment
Read more

WHO SHOULD OR SHOULD NOT HAVE NUKES IN OUR WORLD TODAY?

I quote the father of nukes himself, Albert Einstein , “ Mankind invented the atomic bomb , but no mouse would ever construct a mousetrap ”… No nation should have nukes. If some would, then any nation who want should be able to… current situation creates a power imbalance because those who have it are seen as extremely powerful, and those who don’t are extremely weak nations… Here is a list of nations with nukes – declared and undeclared: U.S., China, Russia, Pakistan, India, France, UK, Israel, and North Korea . These countries host nukes from other countries – Germany , Italy , Türkiye , Belgium , Netherlands and Belarus … Many of USSR ’s former regions like Ukraine and Kazakhstan had nukes, and were tricked to give them up, a decision they all regret today. It is known that Japan , though do not have nukes, have capabilities to develop and launch them within a short time, even from the space. Why can’t other nations have nukes? Ownership of nukes is why Iran is holding the...
Post a Comment
Read more

U.S. SECRETLY BANNED MANY VISA CATEGORIES FOR NIGERIANS

  Secretly, the U.S. government has paused the issuance of OPT (Optional Practical Training - temporary work permit) to Nigerian students. They have also ceased awarding new student visas to Nigerians with full scholarships. They did this for several other visa categories, including F1 , asylum , and naturalization . It is not that you cannot apply; you can; they just will not process your visa. The reasoning behind this remains a mystery, other than the fact that Nigeria is a nation of concern. No Nigerian has carried out a terrorist attack on U.S. soil or anywhere outside their country... Some relate this to the non-cooperation of President Tinubu 's administration with the current U.S. government in making Nigeria a dumping ground for undocumented migrants. Ghanaians continue to enjoy access to all U.S. visas. The disheartening thing is that this ban/pause/whatever also extends to sponsorship of siblings and several other visa categories... A new executive order, a few days ago...
Post a Comment
Read more